Community, Cultural, Education, Projects

Under the Canopy

“Under the Canopy” is our proposal for the Woodlands Trust Competition
“Under the Canopy” is rooted in the instinct of a farmer building a barn or a soldier making camp: to raise a roof and take cover underneath. It begins with a broad truss of interlocking timbers, raised on wooden columns. Under this roof, the main room is an open space that gives onto the landscape.
It is entirely flexible, surrounded by doors and shutters that be closed shut or thrown open depending on the weather and the many differing needs of the visitors. To the fourth side is a private, insulated block containing office, kitchen and toilets.
The end grains of the timbers in the truss can be painted in memoriam. When interlinked to create the joint, they act an evocation of the strong bonds forged during the war, as well as dappling the sunlight passing through in an echo of a forest canopy.
The straightforward panelised system lends itself to organic growth as needs require and funds allow, so that the building can expand and the rooms within be transformed or upgraded. Much as generations of farmers changed and repaired their buildings, these spaces will thrive with the forest.

Community, Projects, Residential

New Homes for Neighbourhoods I

Architecture Design : Variant Office and Erect Architecture

Location : Natal Road, Brighton, UK
Client : Brighton + Hove City Council

Sector : Residential
Area :  100 sqm
Status: Competition

Brighton and Hove City Council organised a competition to regenerate small pockets of leftover space throughout the city. Variant Office, in collaboration with Erect Architecture, proposed this design for an unused piece of land on a steep slope between two existing houses.

 

To make this a place for a family home, we propose a design carefully moulded to its context. Starting with a minimal rectangular volume following the line of the garage next door, we push and pull the planes of the façade and roof to take account of the complex conditions.

At the ground floor, this sculpting creates a sheltered entrance porch; at the first floor it reveals a Juliet balcony that respects the neighbour’s views. To the rear, the first floor pop-out echoes the recess in the front, while above the half-landing the roof drops and brings light in from above.

The proposed house is brick clad, consistent with the material of its neighbours. Its materiality relates to the adjacent garages and ties the new house visually into the existing context. The recesses to the façade create a lively sculptural rhythm.

This is a generous family home with four-bedrooms, fully accessible to Lifetime standards. Entry is to the west, through a hallway which leads straight to a large living/ kitchen/ dining area, which opens directly to the garden. The stair sits visible at the side of this living space and leads to a more private second family room, which overlooks the double-height space below. The bedrooms upstairs are arranged with views both front and back.

See more of our residential work in our residential section

Community, Projects, Residential

New Homes for Neighbourhoods II

Architecture Design : Variant Office and Erect Architecture

Location : Brighton, UK
Client : Brighton + Hove City Council

Sector : Residential
Area :  375 sqm
Status: Competition

Brighton and Hove City Council organised a competition to regenerate small pockets of leftover space throughout the city. Variant Office, in collaboration with Erect Architecture, proposed this scheme for an unused site hidden behind a ring of semi-detached houses: it is an urban mews in a suburban neighbourhood.

A key feature of the Rotherfield Crescent site is that the project could not disrupt access to the lock-up garages on the edge of the leftover space. For this reason, the proposed scheme consists of four terraced houses pulled to the south of the site to minimise overshadowing the neighbours. This strategy leaves the entire perimeter free, and creates two outdoor places: one behind the houses, which is divided into terraced private gardens that soak in afternoon sunshine, and one in front of the houses, which becomes a shared courtyard for all of the neighbours.

There are three three-bedroom houses and one two-bedroom house, all fully designed to Lifetime Homes standard, and all either dual- or triple- aspect. Each house plan responds to its particular condition, but they all echo the same spatial ideas. In every case, a double-height space is provided overlooking a generous living/dining area.

To minimise visual impact the roofs are flat, but the angled ceiling above the stair echoes the pitched roofs of the neighbouring houses, and articulates the façade. The building fabric is brick, in keeping with the historical precedent of the area.

See more of our residential work in our residential section

 

Community, Projects

Misty Mountain Kindergarten

Location : Molewa, Ruichang, China
Client : Hua Yan Group
Area : N/A
Status: Competition

The Misty Mountain is a kindergarten in a city. The built area is large and the plot ratio high for a kindergarten: we must allow for 4000sqm plus parking. On an acutely-angled site with on-grade parking, this became particularly challenging. Thus, we determined our key design challenges to be threefold:
one, create a dense building which still retains a sense of low scale;
two, ensure engagement with the city while keeping the children private and secure;
three, allow for strong internal-external links, with each classroom having access to its own terrace,
four, provide a sunny playground of sufficient scale.

Community, Masterplanning, News

Some thoughts on Neighbourhood Planning

We attended an interesting conference on Neighbourhood Planning a couple of weeks ago in Ealing organised by the Neighbourhood Forums in that part of west London, including West Ealing, Central Acton and West Hampstead. It was a great learning experience for us – to see how much neighbourhood planning has evolved from its humble beginnings in the Localism Bill passed in 2011, but also understanding the mechanisms and practical action needed to set up a Forum and develop a Plan. It seemed initially that Neighbourhood Forums would be set up and become a tool for NIMBYism at best and at worst a way of allowing rural Tory strongholds to restrict development in their green and glorious countryside locations – whereas what we seemed to be witnessing is possibly the beginnings a transfer of power from a centralised government to localised citizen groupings.

 

However, it was clear that there needs to be a huge investment of time and human toil in organising and getting through the red tape and bureaucracy involved in the set-up of a designated area, creating the forum, developing and ratifying a plan, passing it under referendum run by local authority – all this with a distinct lack of encouragement or assistance from councils in many cases.

 

And of course there were the problems raised of how to develop local plans in areas where there are equally sized but opposed groups of people, with diametrically opposite views for what their local planning policies should be. For example, Stamford Hill in Hackney has divided the community into two opposed camps; or Bermondsey which currently is deciding on four different and overlapping neighbourhood forum designations.

 

On a historical note, it is interesting to see how the shift towards localism is happening. Back in 2006 a series of essays came out exploring “double devolution” for example, calling for new rights at a neighbourhood level with “the creation of neighbourhood bodies with significant powers over the issues that matter most locally…”. Hazel Blears in 2011, when she was secretary for communities and local government applied three tests for a localism agenda to work, which were “if the Government provides the necessary funding, a practical framework for a partnership between government and communities, and fairness to ensure that all communities are given the same opportunities

 

At the moment there is clearly a lack of funding. More worryingly there is the potential democratic failure, not only because a referendum cannot be the only basis for consensus, but who defines who is in and who is out? And should it be up to Local Authorities, who have to approve the process at every stage, to judge? And once implemented who becomes accountable? Is the risk that neighbourhood forums create local oligopolies of people with the time and interests to get involved?

 

Hearing from the ground there is a lot of work being put into setting up forums, talking to community groups and neighbours in an area, producing a neighbourhood plan, which – when there is consensus – can be potentially a powerful tool for local demands to be heard and developed into planning tools. Even the process of defining an area during the neighbourhood area designation stage there is a huge amount of implicit political action – going out of one’s own local contacts to connect with other established groups to ask them how they want to shape the plan. Again, this depends on the outreach and who is included. The on-going process of defining boundaries also defines place-ness, which depends on the activities at a local area that tie people together and which constitute the creation of a place.

 

Some interesting places worth mentioning in London are for example Wards Corner Community Coalition Forum in Tottenham which has recently been set up by community activists who were involved in resisting the whole-scale redevelopment and clearing of the Wards Corner market. Another interesting example is the Heathrow Village Neighbourhood Forum set up following the successful anti-airport group Grow Heathrow and Transition Heathrow, followed by the recent re-emergence of the possibility of London’s airport expansions.

 

Which brings me to the second problem, or indeed opportunity – what planning tools based on land use can work at a local level to address issues of deprivation, under investment, lack of skills and jobs, improving housing and services. Can neighbourhood plans really can be used to develop some creative, radical and progressive local planning policies and projects to address the needs expressed at local level? For example, tapping into the experiences of the consultation input to London Plan by the Just Space group and the London Tenants Federation, for example, around fairer access to housing and local services. Or some of Transition Town’s stronger groups in the UK context who have developed not only policies, but concrete projects based on local alliances of community interests which reflect not only short term agendas but also factoring in longer term concerns around climate change and social justice.

 

One last point, which struck us, were the range of techniques being used during the consultation stages and formation of neighbourhood forums and plans. Indeed, some techniques were deliberately used to challenge the notion of “consultation” to deepen the relationship and ownership over the plan that local people might have. Angela Koch has been working in this area for the last five years, developing a series of in-situ happenings as tools for engagement, consultation, and neighbourhood forum formation in her work in North London with Imagine Places. Also the use of online community mapping tools have been useful as well as online portals for sharing of information. These seem to be still developing and could tie into all sorts of existing platforms which are online, interactive and can engage parts of the community who perhaps had not been involved through more traditional avenues. Neighbourhood Planning 2.0 perhaps as Commonplace have been developing an app to comment on local issues.  These tools can all help us find new approaches for more progressive and inclusive local planning, moving consultation towards ownership and achieving greater local power. We look forward to getting involved and seeing how things progress!

 

(more…)

Community, Projects

Briosco Community Library

Location : Briosco, IT
Client : Comune di Briosco
Area : 450sqm
Budget : £700K
Status: Competiton
Competition entry for  the design of a  local public library in Briosco, Lombardy, Italy. The scheme nestles into the existing park landscape with an intensive green roof that maximises the existing community use while reprogramming the site to create a a series of piazzas with varying degrees of privacy.

The Library facade picks up on the region’s strong tradition in the manufacture of terracotta bricks and tiles, referencing the brick patterning of local farm buildings. Building on the morphology of the ‘cascine’ and courtyards prevalent in the local rural buildings, the library brings footfall from the upper park level via a sunken courtyard lightwell.

The building is designed as a series of flexible spaces that are accessed off the main circulation spine and includes lending and reference sections, a childrens library and a flexible community space that is accessible outside of library opening hours.

The project envelope is built to passivehaus standards, taking advantage of the its partial embedding in the topography and passive solar design to keep reduce its environmental impact. The central courtyard allows for good natural cross ventilation of the building.

 

 

Community, Projects

Olympic Legacy Park

Architecture Design : Ashvin de Vos with Erect Architecture
Location : Stratford, London
Client : London Legacy Development Corporation
Sector : Public Building
Completed : 2013
Budget : £1.8m
Photographer : David Grandorge

The North Park Hub building is the first of the Olympic Legacy projects. It was on a fast-track, 15-month programme to completion. As Associate at Erect Architecture during this time, Ashvin led the in-house team in the design and delivery of the project, from the open competition entry right through to completion. The project required the management of the complex statutory requirements set by the specially created five-borough planning authority, the client and the contractor to deliver this project on time, ready for the opening.

The project received the BREEAM Excellent rating, the World’s foremost environmental assessment method. It went on to win the 2014 Civic Trust Award and Selwyn Goldsmith Award for Accessibility.

The space combines  café, community space and public toilet provisions for the North Park, as well as open area. Clad in thermally treated oak timber on a Cross laminated timber structure the building acts as a continuation of the park’s landcsape – the large forms of the stadia and the sweeping planting of the park. The wide awning allows for sheltered space outside, whereas inside the natural light and views allow for a majestic yet intimate family space to evolve.